Bump ast-serialize version to 0.2.3#21378
Merged
ilevkivskyi merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom Apr 30, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
According to mypy_primer, this change doesn't affect type check results on a corpus of open source code. ✅ |
JukkaL
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2026
This brings in mypyc/ast_serialize#61 The implicit joining improvement is not strictly necessary, all tests, except `testDebugFString` parser test I added, pass even without it, but I would be more confident if we have exact 1:1 match with the old parser behavior.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This brings in mypyc/ast_serialize#61
The implicit joining improvement is not strictly necessary, all tests, except
testDebugFStringparser test I added, pass even without it, but I would be more confident if we have exact 1:1 match with the old parser behavior.cc @JukkaL